Acceleration by Yang

Spandrell

Tl;dr. It really is that simple.

Long version:

I’ve never voted. Well, I lie, I voted once. I was 18, and my mother sorta forced me. It also felt like some rite of passage, you know, you grow to 18 and you get to do grown-up stuff like voting, having a voice in the political process. I’ve never been into rituals though, and I felt stupid immediately after putting my vote in the box. I didn’t even like the guy! I thought he was retarded. All of them, really. I still do.

Of course ever time there’s an election people would ask me now and then who I’m gonna vote to. I evolved a series of bunch of canned answers. First one was “Nah they all suck”. Then I read Bryan Caplan’s Myth of the Rational Voter and started saying “one vote doesn’t count anyway”. This triggered huge discussions if there was even a single Boomer at home. “But if everyone thought like you nobody would vote!!”. 

-“Well sure but my not voting doesn’t influence other people’s behavior”.

“But you have to vote, if nobody voted…”

-“It doesn’t follow that if I don’t vote then other people don’t vote”.

“But you have to vote, if everyone did like you”

-"Where on earth are you taking that 'if' from?

"But you have to vote......"

You should try this, it’s hilarious. They just go in an endless loop bug. Talk about NPCs.

Later I started reading Moldbug and got into this little sphere, so when in good company I’d just say “nah, not voting. Democracy sucks”. I was exquisitely detached about most elections during my adult life. I honestly didn’t give a crap. The Deep State, the Uniparty, the Swamp, call it what you will, it’s all the same. I was beyond all that.

And then… Trump happened 3 years ago. It took me a while to get into Trump. I didn’t care about elections, you see? Elections don’t matter. It’s all the same. And not being American I knew little about the guy. I’d seen him on TV now and then but besides him being this kinda sleazy showbiz guy I couldn’t care much about him.

But I was on Twitter, and I was watching all the outrage, and man, Trump was good. He wasn’t good, good. He wasn’t Moldbug. Not even Pat Buchanan. Trump is really inarticulate, I don’t know his verbal IQ but he has the vocabulary of a dumb 10 year old. And yet he got his points across. Good points. Drain the Swamp. NATO is pointless. Make America Great Again. China is ripping us off. You’d be in jail. No more senseless wars. BUILD THE WALL. All great, and most importantly, hilarious ideas. Trump was trolling everyone that I hated, the press, the bureaucrats, the whole Cathedral was up in arms against him, and *he was fighting back*. Successfully! He was talking shit to AIPAC! I just couldn’t help myself. Trump was my guy. I couldn’t vote for him, I’m not American, but I would have. Honest to god, I’d wake up early and vote for Donald Trump.

The Trump campaign triggered in me a feeling of community, of adhesion that I’d never felt before. And I’d never felt it before because Trump was the first candidate ever who wasn’t representing the conservatives. Which I’m not. Or the Christians. Which I’m not. Or the fiscal conservatives or whatever. Which I care about but not very strongly. Trump arose in 2016 as the candidate of the fast-dying white majority of the United States. And again, I’m not American, but my homeland has a similar predicament, and American politics eventually trickle down to Europe in a few years, so it was easy to identify with. I hadn’t written that essay yet, but I had it in mind, and Trump was the first guy ever to appear to be fighting Bioleninism, then incarnated in the odious, horrible body of Hillary Clinton. And so I really supported the guy. When against all odds he won the election in November 2016, I got drunk and had a blast. I’ll always remember fondly that night.

Fast forward 2 and a half years later. No wall. No jail for Hillary. Narrowly avoided jail himself! The swamp is a big as always. Forever war still going on. Spending more time tweeting about Israel than his own country. Shits on Ann Coulter and says he wants more legal immigration. Did I mention no wall? What a disaster. Trump has been a huge and complete disappointment. Again, I don’t dislike the guy personally. I mean I never *liked* him. He’s weird, talks like a retarded 10 year old. I’d say I’d probably wouldn’t enjoy having a few beers with him but he doesn’t even drink. But I don’t hate the guy, I think odds are his heart is in the right place. He just can’t get stuff done. He’s incompetent. I mean, it’s hard. It was always hard. One just doesn’t come in as a complete outsider and reform the whole government from scratch. Then again, people who work in the heart of the beast, in Washington DC, tell me he’s just incompetent. He could get stuff done. Some stuff at least. But he’s messing everything up. He’s just bad at the job. Incompetent. A boomer after all, who gave his most talented child to a dumb Jew son of a criminal who doesn’t let her or his grandchildren eat proper food because muh Jewry.

So now what? Back to Moldbuggian detachment? Nothing ever changes, huh. The Cathedral really is all powerful. Ever since Trump made some protests about the intelligence agencies being disloyal or outright attacking him, the Establishment feels so powerful they just blatantly say in the press that the CIA are the good guys. Does nobody remember that the CIA being evil was pretty much proven by the 1960s, and that evil CIA ops have been a staple of books and films for decades? Not anymore; they’re not content with being powerful in the shade. They want outright public submission.

Democracy really is a sham; but it’s hard to go back to detachment now that Bioleninism is out in the open. Elections now are openly not about economic policy or social conservatism. Elections now are about the speed of the dispossession of white straight males. It’s for or against Bioleninism. The majority of candidates of the Democratic party are openly talking of “reparations” for black people, i.e. outright Danegeld. And don’t get me started with open hunt to mess with the sexual hormones of white children in schools. It’s going on right there in the open.

The US has an election next year, the campaign is starting now. Given the present demographic trends, it is very likely that Florida, if not Texas, will flip blue very shortly; that means a rock-solid majority for the Democratic party, forever. Donald Trump is likely to be the last white male president in American history. The 2020 election is probably going to be the last election which is more or less contested. Trump does still have a chance.

But Trump is incompetent. He’s not helping. He’s just treading water while another million Third-world immigrants sneak in, another middle-school boy gets injected estrogen because he doesn’t like football, and another hundred-thousand white men just overdose on opioids because you can’t even play a videogame today without being forced to play a black woman avatar. Can you support this guy? I sure can’t. Again, not my nation, but I wouldn’t. I won’t call him a traitor, although many have. But he didn’t build the wall. He’s letting Amazon, Facebook and Twitter campaign openly against him and censor everything to the right, and he hasn’t lifted a finger. He doesn’t deserve support.

It doesn’t seem anyone to his right is going to run third party, and even if he was removed as candidate, the most likely replacement would be the despicable bugman Mitt Romney. So what are the Democrats running? Beto, a tall white guy with a small face (as they say in Japan) which chicks dig, but sounds pretty much clinically retarded. There’s Elizabeth Warren which is the stereotype of the annoying high school teacher who thinks she’s an intellectual because she’s memorized Jane Austen novels. I’m being unfair to her, she did write the Two Income Trap which is a great book on the complete scam which is the modern economy. But still, come on. Pocahontas.

Then there’s Kamala Harris, which is like when you’ve beaten the final boss after an arduous fight, with only 10% HP left, but then the actual final boss comes in and he’s 5 times as powerful and more aggressive. Kamala Harris is a black woman who’s pretty much openly calling for the disenfranchisement of the white male population. She’s Bioleninism incarnated. Hillary in black. Not good. And precisely because of that the most anticipated to win the primaries.

There’s Bernie of course, the last hope of the residual white left. Not the modern Baizuo. The old White left. The Classical Leninists. Who haven’t still realized why they lost that battle. Why socialism is dead in the West. Bernie didn’t work last time, won’t work this time.  A bunch of black girls will twerk to his face in his rallies and then spew some poison gas to his crowd. The press won’t even report it. 

Seriously though, to the extent Bernie represents a constituency that’s not for instant Brazilification, I wish him well, but he’s old and frail, and his program isn’t very interesting. And most importantly, his own constituency is being taken over by a guy who’s 10 times smarter, is young, has actual good ideas, is not white and will give the Bernie crowd everything they want, and more. Much more.

To be precise, $1,000 a month more.

Come Andrew Yang. 

He became famous after an interview with Joe Rogan, which I strongly recommend. He’s good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTsEzmFamZ8

He was also good on Tucker Carlson's (!). Note how he mentions that GDP and unemployment rates are completely bogus figures which hide more than they reveal. He deserves a 10 year dictatorship just for that. But I get ahead of myself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzksqTu9UY4

He’s just very good. I mean look at him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUolzAltwKI

He’s the only candidate in this whole race that doesn’t talk like a bugman. You know what a bugman is. All those politicians and corporate guys who talk in that odd and disingenuous jargon designed to obfuscate. High-grade NPCs, that’s what bugmen are. Well, he isn’t. He goes straight to the issues, analyzes them intelligently, and then has a plan. It may be or may not be a good plan. But I dare you to show me a presidential candidate with a higher IQ than Andrew Yang in the last 30 years. That’s even more of a feat because the guy is East Asian, and God knows East Asians tend to be bugmen too. 

The guy even wrote a book called The War On Normal People, which is the perfect definition of the Left. I should use it as a subtitle for a Bioleninism book.

I’ve been comparing him with Lee Kuan Yew, another famous non-bugman Asian. Well, LKY he’s not. I don’t think he’ll ever go public saying this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wblg2EM758

But Yang is perhaps the second Asian politician ever to be widely liked by the White right. The 4chan and related crowd which heavily supported Trump in 2016 has now gone wholesale to the Yang Gang. Part of it is justified disappointed about Trump not delivering on his promises. Most of it is Yang's promise of Universal Basic Income (UBI), $1,000 dollars a month for every adult US citizen.

But a big part of it is just pure appreciation for the guy. Look at his interview with Tucker. You might remember my last post on Tucker, and how he's revolutionized conservative commentary in the US by arguing that the focus of government should be taking care of working families. Well, Tucker himself liked Yang, and it's no wonder he did. Yang is the candidate who's using the closest arguments to Tucker. By far. He's lamenting the plight of the working man. He's calling to help the rural white middle class who's being ravaged by the opioid suicide crisis. Note that Trump has said some stuff about that, and has tried to get China to stop exports of fentanyl, but he didn't mention white people by name. Yang did, just like that. He's the only guy who's not only overtly or covertly calling for your extinction; he's the only guy on the record for trying to stop it.

And, he's promising to stop it by taxing the hell of the Enemy. Which again, as Tucker mentioned, isn't a huge abstract thing The Jews or the Left. No. The enemy is Big Tech. It's Amazon, it's Google, It's Apple. It's Facebook. It's Twitter. It's Woke Capital. It's those guys who aren't only taking your jobs, they're using their monopoly in the management of information to censore us, hide us, slander us and ostracize us. You might remember that Trump also hinted at doing something about that. Regulate Facebook and Twitter as utilities to make sure the Right could actually fight the Culture War, and perhaps show that there's a majority of people against injecting synthetic hormones into 12 year old children. That he'd make big tech build in America and stop avoiding taxes with blatant laundering tricks. Well, Trump did nothing, and he's avoiding the topic. Yang isn't. I have nothing against Amazon's business, but Bezos chose sides by buying the Washington Post and recently going on a censorship spree, banning right wing books from Amazon. He must pay. Yang says he will.

I don't know if UBI would work. Americans are crying bloody murder about a proposed 10% VAT. I say cry me a river. Europeans have a 20% VAT. It's annoying, but it's not a big deal. Smart people say that automation is overhyped, it's not growing that fast, self-driving cars, one of the biggest talking points of Yang, are likely to not even happen after all. That may be true. But I'd like to say that the beauty of UBI is not that it's actually necessary in the way Yang says it is, to give people something to fall back on while they find a new job.

Tucker is also worried about the middle class trucker. But Tucker's answer is to ban automation. Go full Luddite. Yang is talking about automation a lot. But he doesn't want to stop it. By implementing UBI he wouldn't stop automation, he'd accelerate it. Businesses would start automating like crazy once people left unsatisfying jobs to go play Fortnite on UBI or try an instagram e-thot career. A big majority of white collar jobs are complete and utter bullshit make-work made by government regulation to keep people busy and have some income to tax. If Yang succeeded in his proposed plan to completely change the regulatory paradigm to adapt to the computer economy at last, companies could actually get rid of all the inefficiencies, and automate everything. Starting with the bureaucracy.

You know who else is doing this? China. In 2017 when Xi Jinping basically named himself president for life, I was asked to look into his alleged eminence grise, Wang Huning. This guy wrote a book after a trip to America in the 1980s, when China was trying to find a way to square the circle of their adoption of free-market enterprise in the country. Wang realized he could justify free enterprise by saying that the United States "manages the people through their businesses, by regulating employment and taking taxes from labor". Basically arguing that Communism and Capitalism weren't so different, the latter as just outsourcing the "people management" to the business corporations.

Well China is pushing hard for developing AI and automation. Which is weird in a country which could have a serious unemployment problem if automation goes on. But China doesn't care. Why not? Because China has realized that with Internet and modern computing, they don't need the corporations to manage the people anymore. They can do it directly. Everybody has a mobile phone with a camera and a microphone 24/7 with them. The government knows your every move. You don't need to shame people into buying your ideology by threatening with firing them from their jobs, like America does. That's so 20th century. Now you can control behavior directly with internet surveillance. Social credit is an extension of this trend. It boggles the mind that accelerationists aren't talking more about this. Not saying it's a good thing. But the tech is here and it's happening anywhere. The only place where it isn't happening is Europe because we've outsourced it to American companies.

If you think UBI might work at giving people hope and readjusting the economy in a more just and fair way, sticking it to the oligarchs, vote for Yang. If you just want $1,000 a month, vote for Yang. If you think UBI would crash everything, vote for Yang, as this gay earth deserves crashing. If you just want UBI to show people that democracy inevitable ends with the people voting themselves money and thus proving democracy is a sham and discredit it as a political system, vote for Yang.

And if you want the final death of 20th century politics, and a new paradigm which breaks with the thievery of Boomers inflating the currency so that asset prices are rising through new records every year, while young people have to go through unpaid internships and 'gig economy' servitude until their 40s, while the Bioleninist government is busy with the soft genocide of every productive person with natural biological instincts.

Then Vote for Yang. I rest my case.

Duke of Qin

You are a smart guy Spandrell, and cynical to boot, which is why I am surprised you actually believed Trump would change anything. Any basic character study of the man would quickly establish a few fundamentals. He is a Jew Yorker, born and bred. His has a historical record of screwing his business associates immediately when the power balances shifted. Which speaks to his ruthlessness, but his stiffing of his contractors speaks to his treacherousness and sociopathy. Nickle and diming his subordinates says a lot what he will do for the average American i.e. "losers". His wealth stems from inherited real estate, again in Jew York, and being a reality TV clown. A couple of Russian political terms I've learned from Karlin over the years bear repeating. Always suspect Zrada (betrayal) and the more faith you put in a man, the harder he will twist the knife. Russian nationalists are always on the lookout for it and see the potential for Putinsliv at every opportunity. Certainly Western Europeans and Americans aren't quite so jaded in their daily social interactions and retain a childlike or rather lemminglike faith in their elected officials, but I didn't expect them to be that stupid. It seems Westerners have underestimated how rapidly their social institutions have rotten underneath to the point that they are now only wearing the still official norms like a flappy skinsuit. Perhaps its because I'm Chinese and ergo naturally cynical or perhaps its because I'm Chinese and thus have no wistful desire in the survival of Western civilization, but I saw the Trumpsliv coming from a mile away. It should have been obvious given the kind of man Trump is, a fat boomer narcissistic charlatan, which is the one criticism that his enemies were 100% on target, but hope springs eternal. As for Yang, I'm indifferent not because I am certain his accelerationism wont work, but rather because he has too many powerful entrenched interests to fight through. At the end of the day, it's all about the money, and there are too many enemies on that front, starting with the evil fat black women who make up so much of the Democratic Party primary voters whose share of existing handouts far eclipses a measly $1000 a month and who aren't looking to share with Whitey.

Spandrell
Replying to:
Duke of Qin

Can't say I'm surprised he was this dumb. I wasn't expecting anything. I just enjoyed too much seeing him destroy the bugman consensus of 100 years by running a total troll campaign on everything liberals think is holy. And win. I will curse his memory for not building the wall, but I'll always appreciate how much he made me laugh in those late months of 2016. I also don't expect Yang to win, but seeing the American Left argue against giving free money is going to be amusing. I wanna see them openly say "we're giving free money for everyone except white men".

kapy53
Replying to:
Duke of Qin

Yang would let them keep their higher entitlements. They wouldn't get the dividend but instead retain what they have. The only problem with Yang though is communicating down. He's very smart, and at the Yang Gang meeting I was at it was mostly STEM types. Trump was able to get a message out that Pro Wrestling fans could understand. I'm not sure how Yang can fight the "inflation" NPC response. Probably just wave one thousand bucks in the air.

Spandrell
Replying to:
kapy53

Anything else you can say on the meeting?

Bartolo

He favours affirmative action and obviously does not like white conservatives. The video with the 2 other Asian guys makes it clear. 10 min 38 secs. Just saying.

alf

Had to be said about Trump. Sad. Not seeing Yang break through though. Too much niche appeal, not enough mass appeal. But, good meme.

Duke of Qin
Replying to:
kapy53

The gravy train to blacks doesn’t end directly with simple gibs. There are legions of evil fat black women riding the government gravy train through make work employment that costs a lot more than $12000 dollars a year. The ubi would have substantial 2nd and third order effects which I’m not smart enough to see through all of it, but for certain it would end the make work for blacks in order to pay for it. Black women would certainly balk at losing a 40k do nothing job for 12k and being permanently unemployed. Even if they are certainly not smart enough to recognize it, those that are will certainly be happy enough to explain it to them and base cunning will suffice for them to realize how bad of a deal it is for them. Another impact is that 12k a year to American citizens will probably have an immediate impact on immigration rates. In that it will encourage more to come, but it will universally incentivize every citizen here to vote to immediately shut the door. One thing direct cash money to the bank means is that now everyone has direct skin in the game to shut down the door as opposed to generalized opposition being countered by elite lobbying. Several American Indian tribes who run casinos run direct gibs to their tribal members and in every case where it is so, they all vote to restrict tribal membership and in fact expel members from their official tribal rolls to keep the pot as big as possible for the remainder. Once each American citizen realizes that the size of their gimme is contingent on the total number of Americans, it would not be surprising for either a permanent foreign helot labor class to form akin to the Gulf States, or that the vast number of illegals are meticulously, thoroughly, and immediately, thrown out of the country along with their families. Birthright citizenship would of course also be revoked.

kapy53
Replying to:
Spandrell

Basically, he's going to be the Ron Paul of the Democratic party. Along with Tulsi Gabbard anybody with half a brain is going to get behind one of them but ultimately either Beta O'Rourke or Mayor Buttchug will be the nominee thanks to dumb white women.

kapy53
Replying to:
kapy53

This is based on the kinds of people there, their excitement level and how the rest of the Democratic student groups thought of Andrew Yang. Many there were already treating him like Ron Paul, just hoping his UBI platform would get heard and adopted by someone else in the future.

bobby

I think the book written by Charles Murray - In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State, has a better explanation of UBI. UBI is the only way to replace the failed welfare system in the West.

Acceleration by Yang | Reaction Times

[] Source: Bloody Shovel []

Name

Yang will do nothing as well. Not UBI, not warring against Big Tech, nothing. Things will keep slowly descending. Best thing is to create Private Associations like the Northwest Front, like the Amish, like the Mormon and then grow a new country out of it. Meanwhile, spread redpills and hope for a candidate that would have the balls to impose dictatorship - but then again, every government agency and even the army would be against him. The system is a beast that doesn't allow anyone to stop itself from feeding and increasing.

Palimpsest

Nice musings. Always comforting to read people on an eerily similar wavelength of thought. This sci fi story has a world kind of like the one envisaged here: https://medium.com/@adamwinfield/under-toronto-6d457338408d The recent Tucker post was top draw too.

Steve Johnson
Replying to:
bobby

If you think the welfare system has failed you don't understand Bioleninism. The welfare state is a massive success. It cheaply (compared to the costs of communism) buys off loyalty of bodies who are eligible to vote. It induces them to actually breed (while successfully suppressing the fertility of anyone who might be a thread).

Steve Johnson

So we're all clear here - UBI will never happen. There's a structural reason it doesn't exist now and that reason isn't exactly "it's too expensive" - it's that it doesn't pay off supporters at the expense of non-supporters. "Let's bribe 100% of the electorate" vs "Let's bribe the identifiable supporters of the ruling party" It would be interesting to see how the Democratic party weasels out of supporting UBI but the simple solution is that they won't even have to - they'll ignore it and the press will ignore it with them.

Alrenous

If everyone though like me, then voting would work. Also there would be no need to vote since the guy who's already in charge would also be thinking like me.

Spandrell
Replying to:
Steve Johnson

Yeah well. I wanna see the Democrats deny people money.

akarlin
Replying to:
Duke of Qin

Incidentally, on the off chance that Yang somehow actually wins, it will be fascinating to see the repercussions on China-US-Russia relations. Yang happens to be a strong Sinophile - towards the PRC, despite his Taiwanese background. I suspected this from the start when I searched through his Twitter and policy platforms, but a couple of people who I know and who are know him have confirmed this (they support him, so they have no incentives to make things up). I strongly expect him to pursue a "reset" with China, including ofc dropping the trade war - which would put him at odds not just with Trump, but even many prominent Dems (e.g. Schumer and Pelosi). Yang should be very good for China, and perhaps less good for Russia, as he seems to share the standard Dem position on Russia (though isn't obsessed with it like Kamala). OTOH, it's really hard to say; as Trump showed, one needs to be careful what one wishes for. There is the possibility of a Chinagate torpedoing everything and actually further worsening US-Chinese relations as Yang tries to prove he isn't beholden to China.

Il candidato che vuole vincere coi meme | TOTALITARISMO

[] (segnalo, da consultare cum grano salis, “AltLeft“, “Unz” e “Bloody Shovel“). Ovviamente tutto ciò non poteva che mettere in allerta la stampa, sia perché []

Staying one step ahead | AlfaNL

[] the way, while we are on the subject, I fully endorse Spandrell’s opinion on Trump. Trump has fallen into the rightist trap: instead of building something new, he tried to conserve []