Patriarchal Sexual Law

Spandrell

We live in a world of sexual license. Sexual freedom we could say. You can sleep with whoever you want and neither state authorities, nor most people, will interfere with your sexual life. You can even engage in the most unnatural, disgusting and disease-inducing activities; but criminal law just has nothing against you.

This alone is a sign that the patriarchy doesn't exist anymore. Patriarchies are systems in which all women belong to a man; the husband after marriage, the father before that, or the head of the household if she's a servant of some sort. Women have this uncanny ability to make men want to have sex with them, and at the same time prefer to have exclusivity in that matter. Not to mention the potential for disease or childbirth. So naturally their legal guardians had to take care that women, i.e. their property, was not captured by other men to have sex with them without proper compensation. As such, law regulating sex in the pre-modern period where every bit as complicated, and as harsh, as laws regulating finance and property in our day.

Imperial Chinese law on marriage is a lot of fun, but most interesting are their laws on fornication. Fornication belonged to criminal law, ever since the very first complete legal code on compiled during the early Tang Dynasty in 624, which has remained to us as the 唐律疏義 tánglü shūyì. More importantly, rape was understood as fornication + force, a more serious crime but nothing really different. The difference is stark between a legal code which lasted pretty much intact for 1300 years, and our present day of female supremacy, when rape has been reinterpreted every few years as the single most heinous crime that can be committed, while at the same time requiring no standards of proof.

What follows is a translation of the legal code of the Qing dynasty (1644-1911), the 大清律例 dàqīng lülì, tome 33. I have the book but you can find the text in Wikisource.

犯姦 Fornication

1. 凡和姦杖八十 . Any fornicator gets 80 strokes of the big stick.

zhang was a big wooden stick with a flat surface, the worst of two available corporal punishments. It was normally applied to the buttocks or the back. If done strongly it could kill a fit man after 50 strokes or so. The traditional maximum was 200, so it was usually never applied that strongly. Bribes to the executioner in advance helped make him feel weak that day.

At any rate, 80 strokes for peaceful, consensual fornication is a lot of strokes. 80%+ of the sex going on in any modern society is fornication. Think about that.

0

有夫者杖九十.  If there's a husband, 90 strikes.

Obviously any consensual fornication with a woman with a husband is morally worse than if the woman is single, so you get 12% more strikes of the big fat wooden bat.

刁姦者[無夫有夫]杖一百. Seducers get 100 strokes, whether the woman has or does not have a husband.

- 刁姦 supposedly meant getting to fornicate on false pretences; the man (or woman, I guess) getting to seduce the other part by lying about its attractiveness or something. 100 strokes to you for lying. -

強姦者絞. Rapists [literally "forced fornicatiors"] get hanged. Not immediately, most death penalties were done after review on autumn. But rapists got hanged, period.

未成者杖一百流三千里. Attempted (but unfulfilled) rape  gets exile to 3,000 li away.

- A li was a bit more than 500m during the Qing (set at 576m around 1900), so about 1,700km away. -

凡問強姦須有強暴之狀婦人不能掙脫之情亦須有人知聞及損傷膚體毀裂衣服之屬方坐絞罪 This is commentary to the law: “All cases of rape require proof of violence, and proof that the woman couldn't get away. Also they need someone in the know (i.e. a witness) and damage to the skin [of the victim] as well as her clothes, in order for the penalty of hanging to be valid."

若以強合以和成猶非強也. If intercourse starts as forced but ends as consensual then [it means] it wasn't forced".

- Important point here. Very important point. Again this is commentary later added to the law. I wonder what case(s) prompted this to be added.-

如一人強捉一人姦之行姦人問絞強捉問未成----流罪""If one man forcibly captures [a woman] and another man rapes her, the rapist gets hanged. Attempted rape gets exile"

又如見婦人與人通姦見者因而用強姦之已係犯姦之婦難以強論依刁姦律  If a man sees a woman fornicating, and because of that rapes her, it's unfair to argue it's rape, and so it's sentenced as "seduction". So rape of a fornicator gets you 100 strokes of the rod, not the death penalty. Hey, she was in the market after all.

姦幼女十二歲以下者雖和同強論. Fornication with a girl below 12 years old gets treated as forcible (rape), i.e. hanged, period. Not unlike what Anglo countries call "statutory rape".

其和姦刁姦者男女同罪. In case of consented fornication and seduction, men and women get the same penalty.

姦生男女責付姦夫收養. If fornication results in a birth, the male fornicator must raise the child.

姦婦從夫嫁賣, 其夫願留者聽. If the female fornicator is married, her husband can sell her to someone else, or keep her if he so chooses.

若嫁賣與姦夫者姦夫本夫各杖八十婦人離異歸宗財物入官 If she is sold to the male fornicator, the fornicator *and* the cuck husband each get 80 strokes of the big stick. The woman is sent back to her father and her property is impounded by the government.

強姦者婦女不坐 Raped women have no punishment.

若媒合容止[人在家]通姦者各減犯人[和刁]罪一等 . People who promote or provide lodgings for fornication get the same punishment as fornicators, with one degree less. So 70 strokes of the big stick instead of 80.

[如人犯姦已露而代]私和姦事者各減[和刁強]二等 . People who, knowing fornication took place, do not denounce it to the authorities and instead helps the parties reach a private agreement, get the same punishment, with two degrees less. So 60 strokes of the big stick.

*This part is important*.

其非姦所捕獲及指姦者, 勿論. If someone claims there was fornication but didn't actual caught them in the act, there is no crime.

若姦婦有孕[姦婦雖有據而姦夫則無憑]罪, 坐本婦. If a female fornicator is pregnant, she alone is punished. After alone, there is proof of her deed, but not of the man's.

- Again, you needed proof, which wasn't easy to come by. -

After the main articles come some further detailed regulations.

條例

一 、凡職官及軍民姦職官妻者 , 姦夫、姦婦女並紋監候 . If a public official or military man fornicates with the wife of a public official, both male and female fornicator hang.

若職官姦軍民妻者,革職,杖一白的決. If a public official fornicates with the wife of a military man, he is fired and gets 100 strokes of the big stick, [maximum penalty]. In this case the sentence had to be executed, he couldn't evade it with money (as normal penalties could).

姦婦枷號 一 個月,杖 一 百. Fornicating military wife must carry the cangue for a month, and 100 strokes of the big stick.

01

- The cangue was a square made of wood with a hole for the head, or sometimes the hands, which people couldn't get off. It's basically a very funny way of making everyone know you're a criminal. In this case a huge slut.

其軍民相姦者,姦夫 、 姦婦各枷號 一 個月,杖 一 百. If two military people fornicate, they get the cangue for one month, and 100 strokes of the big stick.

其奴婢相姦,不分 一 主,各主,及軍民與官員,軍民之妾婢相姦者,姦夫姦婦各杖一百. If two servants fornicate, whether they belong to the same master, or have different masters, as well as when military men fornicate with the concubine of a military men or a public official,  both fornicators get 100 strokes of the big stick.

- Note that simple fornication between free people was 80 strokes. -

凡有輪姦之案,審實,俱照光棍例,分別首從定擬. For cases of gang rape, after investigating the truth, officials must follow the Thug Regulations, and sentence separately the leader of the gang and the followers.

- The Thug Act being apparently Qing Dynasty official jargon for a special law for hoodlums and petty gangsters that the dynasty set up pretty early on. A principle of that law was to punish gang leaders with immediate beheading, and followers with deferred hanging. I guess the idea was to get the followers to rat on each other with the hope of having their death sentence annulled before Hanging Season started in the fall. -

The following article was about 雞姦, literally "chicken fornication", which my dictionary tells me means "sex between men". That I think is matter of another post.

My classical Chinese isn't perfect and my legalese is even worse, so if there's any error please let me know. But I think my translations are decent. I hope you get the gist of the law. Sex happens within marriage; period. If you must fornicate, at least take care that nobody knows or cares.

Patriarchal Sexual Law | @the_arv

[] Patriarchal Sexual Law []

Mr. Random Commentuer

H_ly f_ck_ng sh_t. Brilliant post.

Toddy Cat

Did Imperial China have prisons, or was it all corporal punishment, execution, and fines?

Dividualist

>Sex happens within marriage; period. Um, probably prostitution and sex slaves / concubines balanced the picture. Also fornicating with ones own servant seems to be missing from the list and likely for a good reason. So it seems men, esp. wealthier men did actually have out of marriage options, just women didn't? Also, many societies discovered the kind of equilibrium that prostitution must be allowed, it is just that normal women and prostitutes must be two very separated categories with no overlap, this even meaning prostitutes wearing special clothing and hairstyles. Despite modern narrative portraying prostitutes as victims, I have met a couple of so extremely promiscuous women that becoming a prostitute would have been rather a natural expression of their inclinations. So in these kinds of societies prostitution meant a plan B for women, of course, running away from daddy successfully may be difficult. I don't know, did this plan B exist in China? James Clavell novels have stuff like Good Guy Greg is fucking a bought concubine (not sure if slave) for years, making her kids, then basically as a reward he sells her to become the wife of some poorer dude, apparently this is a reward because now she can get the higher status of being a wife, apparently the man is not too bothered about it. Not sure if Clavell is any reliable tho. Anyway my impression is that it sounds like a system optimized for denying sexual choice to normal women while allowing pretty much everything else, prostitution, buying and selling concubines, lots of things that would make a Victorian blush. Unlike Victorian culture, not prudish about sex in general, just making sure normal women have no choice. Everything else basically OK. This seems to be my impression, but I know little.

pwyll

Typo, 1st paragrah: I believe "You can sleep with whoever you want and the state authorities, nor most people" ...should be... "You can sleep with whoever you want and neither the state authorities, nor most people" (feel free to delete this comment)

pwyll

Another typo, second paragraph. I think "the father belong that" should be "the father before that". (again, feel free to delete this comment.)

Spandrell
Replying to:
Toddy Cat

Prison was the 3rd harshest penalty, after the big stick. Maximum was 3 years, though. The found anything longer than that to be barbaric.

Spandrell
Replying to:
pwyll

Thanks.

Spandrell
Replying to:
Dividualist

Concubines were junior wives, and had rights as such. You got the Big Stick if you messed with someone elses concubine. But yes, prostitutes were fair game, of course. And there were no shortage of those. But it wasn't *that* common either.

Patriarchal Sexual Law | Reaction Times

[] Source: Bloody Shovel []

sfoil

This seems like about the right post to ask: what's the deal with high-status Asians taking professional entertainers/actresses as wives? There are modern examples, but I recall you mentioning some of the emperors doing this as well, so this isn't some modern degeneration. Obviously there is a tradition of concubinage (which basically doesn't exist in Christendom, nor really in Antiquity) so maybe the "wives" were much lower status than strictly-monogamous European equivalents. Things have changed recently but marrying an entertainer seems to have ranged from gauche to completely unacceptable among Europeans with even a pretense of elite status for almost the entirety of recorded history. There was something of a niche for "courtesan" types but I don't think that's what is going on. Were the Chinese more strict about separating entertainers from prostitutes? Did the nature of Imperial legitimacy make political/dynastic marriages pointless? Were these women "hobbyists" rather than professionals (e.g. formal dancing, chamber music)? Am I just completely off base? Interested in your thoughts.

Spandrell
Replying to:
sfoil

Apparently concubinage was common in Ancient Greece, so there's that. I guess you recall me mentioning Han Wudi's wife? That was 100 BC; can't really remember any entertainer becoming an imperial concubine after that. There's Xi Jinping today, hah. Maybe he plans to be a great conqueror like Wudi. Taking an entertainer was a concubine was pretty gauche in China too; but there seems to have been a culture of "men will be men", while in Europe public opinion had a much larger input from women. Ditto about dress and morality in general.

maieuticinitiate
Replying to:
Spandrell

I have the impression that as we go forward in history towards modernity, we see more and more corporal punishments, capital punishments and fines being substituted for prison time. Would you validate that impression?

maieuticinitiate

Probable typos: "The difference is start between a legal code (...) 1300 years our present day" might be "The difference is STARK (...) 1300 years AND our present day".

Spandrell
Replying to:
maieuticinitiate

Absolutely. The idea of life imprisonment in imperial China and pre-modern Europe would've been positively absurd.

Spandrell
Replying to:
maieuticinitiate

yes, thank you.

Rollory
Replying to:
sfoil

The Empress Theodora (Justinian's wife) was a prostitute and a stage actress, from what I remember.

sfoil
Replying to:
Spandrell

"there seems to have been a culture of 'men will be men', while in Europe public opinion had a much larger input from women" I think that's the answer I was looking for. I skimmed the Wikipedia lists of empresses and imperial concubines, and the page for Han Wudi's wife was the only one that indicated she was a professional entertainer (interesting note: no one has gone through those pages to change BC/AD to BCE/CE, which I suspect indicates Sinology's continuing academic unfashionability), with a few references to non-professional pastimes for other women. I assume that if a bigshot saw a dancer he wanted she would be a concubine (but not a notable one) rather than a mistress. Chinese concubines might have generally enjoyed higher social status but less "liberty" than Western mistresses, and the former is frankly polygamous while the latter exists on the fringes of basically monogamous customs, but they're generally comparable making the usual allowances for East/West differences. Most of the examples I can think of of are modern (like Mao) and/or merchant types (businessmen taking former minor singers and starlets as trophy wives etc). My extrapolation into legacy elites was in error based on your one data point, poorly remembered. My impression is that Greek concubinage was vestigial at most by the Classical Period ("ancient Greece" in popular imagination) but I've never really researched it.

Karl
Replying to:
Rollory

Probably slander, although Theodora was not noble by birth.. She was hated by Prokop who claimed that she had commited almost any possible misdeed, especially sexual misdeeds.

Drako L Bluewing

This is a preferable alternative to modern day sex laws.