A sad day for diversity

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/912759135862738945

And so the pozz continues to spread. Let's see if Saudi men have any blood in their veins. Probably not. Islamism will turn out to have been just a CIA operation after all.

[…] A sad day for diversity […]

"Islamism will turn out to have been just a CIA operation after all." Rumor has it that the CIA doesn't want war with Iran, because it believes that it can bring about regime change through internal poz. What do you think?

[…] Source: Bloody Shovel […]

KSA is starting a massive privatization push, according to the Guardian is gonna be bigger than Thatcher or the post-Soviet fire sale, it’s the total victory of Neoliberalism or simply is the sheiks that are bankrupt after the War in Yemen and the Syria failure?

https://oogenhand.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/did-the-dajjal-enter-mecca/https://oogenhand.wordpress.com/2013/01/11/does-saudi-arabia-need-mras/ Four years ago, the rot set in. Note the comment of Ed the Department Head.

Wonder why this decision has been taken. SA has a true-Green religious police, however. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic\_religious\_police#Saudi\_Arabia This might cause some disturbances....

A coup against the new young regent would make all the sense in the world.

As long as they're wearing sleeping bags over their heads, this plays more as a PR move. The Saudi conspiracy looks real after Burma, so I'm skeptical.

The isolation and guarding of females stopped to make sense and the Hejaz Arabs are not stupid (just consider their fabulous wealth). With the widespread use of the pill, sex is fun without serious consequences for the tribe; and the cost of keeping them masturbating in the haram is too heavy even for Saudis. Females tend to be industrious and can work while no power on Earth can make a nargila-smoking Bedouin to do anything resembling work.

Possible trajectory (no claim to its truth): - King declares women can drive in 10 months. - Social pressure keeps the majority of attached women from driving - Meanwhile, the initiative to get women driving is poorly-supported and women get on the roads with barely any training - A few months in, there are a couple of high-profile serious pile-ups involving women drivers - Much weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth, with mothers and sisters and daughters (and sons and fathers, but less so) crying all over the telly about how terrible these accidents are and how they miss their dead woman who was such a spot of brightness and originality - 'Having women drive is too dangerous by half, and it's bad for the environment because it puts more cars on the road' - King declares women can no longer drive - 'We tried it; it didn't work out'

Sex is fun for the 20%. But if you're saying that Saudis are thinking that after living off the oil they'll start living off their women; well that does make some sense.

By empowering a whole new generation of Oligarchs the Saudi Royal Family can bind them into the "hang together or hang separately" Ancien Regime privilege nexus. At least until the Oligarchs in question go full Goolag.

"Islamism will turn out to have been just a CIA operation after all." India's history with Islam belies this. More likely Islam is a Tiger that CIA thinks it can ride, but actually cannot. This religion has survived 1400 years. Let's wait and watch

This sort of thing has happened exactly how many times in the past? Women will be taken off the roads only if the Wahabbis come to power in some sort of a revolution, which has a fair chance of happening since I believe Islam, like a cat, has nine lives. It is a never a good idea to count Islam out. Failing that, the female-license Juggernaut will continue rolling on.

There is an uneasy balance/alliance between the Saudi Monarchy and the Wahabbis at the moment. Perhaps this is the king's way of making a power move against the Mullahs? You know, the age old Warrior vs Priest conflict, Warriors and priests being natural enemies. Could his be The Kshatriya-Brahmin conflict that Modlbug keeps talking about?

Hey J, what happened to your blog?

In the Islamic world? Plenty. Check out Iran 1967 vs Iran 2017. But like I said, I'm not claiming it's likely that's what's going on or anything. Our host's analysis is the far likelier. The idea just occurred to me as amusing.

I think is more the case of the Saudi royals recognizing that they’re just a US-israeli client State and their survival is totally dependent of being in good terms with the Globohomo ruling class.

Interesting hypothesis. Perhaps, what he is doing is using Low against Middle in the standard way. He is creating a power-base of women that can allow him to degrade, defeat and destroy his rivals. Such a move sends a "signal" to the West and may well result in support (moral and material) for him and his "cause" whatever that might be. If SA does get into trouble, then this liberal "signalling" may be an investment in that the West will back him against others, including the Wahabbis.

How is castrating the enemy a Bad Thing? Evangelical colonels take over here, girls drive there -- Good Thing.