The Song Golden Age

Posted by Spandrell on

People are asking for more Chinese history. I agree. Chinese history is great. It's long, it's well documented, and it's documented in explicitly moralistic terms. Chinese thought has been always focused in how to achieve good governance, and histories are written as to contain parables of what good government is, and what bad government leads to. The most valued history book in China, the Zizhi Tongjian 資治通鑒, written by Sima Guang in 1084, again explicitly states that it is to be an aid for emperors and mandarins to achieve good governance. Good government leads to nice things. Bad government leads to death and misery. That's all Chinese intellectuals have ever cared about. I think it's a good priority to have.

Sima Guang was a brilliant scholar, and it's a huge pity that he finished his book just before the best story in Chinese history happened. The Jingkang Incident of 1127. Oh man, that's such a great, great story. There should be more books about it. It's perhaps the most compelling story in the history of mankind. It's just so unbelievably simple, yet dramatic. It's so good it seems fiction. But no fiction is this good. Anyway, let me tell you this story. It'll probably take several parts.

So again, the time is the Song Dynasty, 960-1279. If you've been reading my posts on the Water Margin, you have some minimum background.  The Song Dynasty was under many accounts the most wealthy and successful of all Chinese dynasties. Not to date; the best dynasty, period. Better than anything than came later. Richer, more urbanized, and arguably with better technology. The Song Dynasty had machinery that the Qing Dynasty didn't have in the 19th century. The Song economy had huge foreign trade links, and the Song government in 1000 again had higher revenues than the Chinese government in 1900.

Some argue that that was the result of better governance. As seen in the previous post, the Song had solved an eternal problem of Chinese governance: how to deal with the military and the aristocracy. The solution they took was to screw them both, and put the government completely in hands of the bureaucracy. They set up their model civil examination system, reduced the number of eunuchs to a minimum, took care the armies in the provinces didn't get too big, kept most of the imperial family in the capital so they didn't develop territorial power. I wonder if urban life was also meant to keep them busy having fun while depressing their fertility. Not a bad research idea.

Anyway, of course the obvious result of all that is that the army sucked balls. The Song army sucked really badly. How badly? Well compare a map of the dynasties of China.

han-dynasty-map

This is the first big Chinese dynasty, the Han dynasty, 202 BC - 220 AD. See it owns most of China proper, it also includes north Vietnam, north Korea, and the Tarim Basin, i.e. the Silk Road oases where today the Uyghurs live. It didn't start like that; the imperial territory was extended mostly by one guy, the emperor Wu (156-87), who was a truly amazing individual. I should write his story some day, but you could also watch 漢武大帝 which is an awesome show.

Anyway the Han Dynasty fell mostly when the Roman Principate fell. Like Rome too it kinda recovered once,  but then they started fighting each other and the northern barbarians took over one half of it. Oh, parallels. And people say there are no patterns in history.

Anyway, Rome never recovered its glory, but China did unite again. It took a while, until the Sui Dynasty, but the whole thing didn't start working properly again until the Tang Dynasty (618-907). The Tang's peak territory looks like this:

e59490e69c9de79686e59f9fefbc88e7ae80efbc89

Look at that. The Tang owned all the Han did, and then some. The Tang owned the whole Mongolian steppe, Central Asia well up to the borders of Persia, not only north but a big chunk of South Korea. Now all that is, well, theoretical. The core Chinese land remained the same, everywhere else was populated by foreign peoples. But the Tang had beaten them militarily, every single one, and forced them to swear allegiance. It didn't take much for that allegiance to disappear; in about a century the Tang lost of all of Central Asia, the Tarim Basin, Mongolia and Korea. But the Tang had managed once to crush everyone, fair and square. The Chinese still love to read about the great Tang Taizong and how he led the best Chinese armies ever to beat everyone up to Persia.

Let's look now at the Song then.

01200000012881116867030574867

The Song were beyond small. They were by far the smallest dynasty in Chinese history. They lost Vietnam, which is still around by the way. They let a bunch of quasi-Tibetan herders, the Tanguts, grab the Northwest, the path to the Silk Road, land that had been Chinese for a thousand years. And they even lost the northern edge of the Chinese heartland, the land around Beijing today. Look at this topographic map.

screenshot2013-06-04at12-59-07am

You see that Beijing is at the edge of a huge plain. That's why the capital is there, to watch the mountain passes which divide China proper from the steppes at the north. You must control those passes, else the nomads come raiding whenever they want. Well, to be fair, the Song hadnt lost it, nor it lost Vietnam or all the others. All those lands were taken during the civil war after the Tang collapsed. The Song just failed to recapture them. The area of Beijing was taken by the Khitan, a dynasty of Mongolic herders, which as you can see in the previous map, was big, very big, and very very strong. The Song tried dozens of time but they couldn't dislodge them, nor could they beat the Tanguts, who were at most a bunch of ten thousand of herders. The Song was by far the smallest and weakest of all Chinese dynasties.

They didn't care though: they were swimming in money. Losing access to the Silk Road forced them to trade by sea: and surprise, maritime trade is much more profitable! The Song Dynasty had higher revenues in 1000 than the Qing dynasty had in 1900. Their technology boomed: by some accounts the Song had better machinery than the Qing 800 years later. Urbanization rates were also the highest China ever saw until the 20th century.

The Song were weak, but they were rich: they decided it was cheaper to pay off the barbarians than to keep an army to fight them. And it was true. What were the barbarians going to do with all that silver anyway? They naturally spent it in buying stuff from China. So the silver went away as tribute, and came back as trade. Better than to keep an army of uppity generals and risk that they stage a rebellion or blackmail the court every now and then. While a section of the bureaucracy was against such a dishonorable treaty, the smartest Mandarins knew that in order to keep running the government they'd better pay off the barbarians and keep the military from having any influence at court.

It was a massive diplomatic coup. It worked brilliantly. The Khitan were actually fairly civilized people. They were literate in Chinese, developed their own script based on it, run a fairly sophisticated state apparatus. The problem between nomadic herders and settled farmers is that nomadic life is hard. It's hard to live off animal products only. Nomads also want grain, cloth, paper, tea, you know, nice stuff. The only way of getting it is to trade or to take it by force. But the Khitan managed to invade a small bunch of Chinese land. It was enough for them; they got their small territory of Chinese land, full of Chinese farmers to make grain for them, Chinese scribes to run their government for them. The Khitan kept their capital north of the mountains, enjoyed their hunting and herding, and as long as the Song kept sending silver and silk, they respected a peace that lasted a 100 years.

The weakness of the Song solved the Mongol problem, allegedly for the price of the tax income of a single province. The army didn't like it, but the army could go to hell. At the Song it was the mandarins who run things. And they were doing a mighty fine job. The population doubled to more than 100 million people. Printing was invented and developed into a national industry, as well as gunpowder. Art and literature also developed beyond anything previous. It was a Golden Age. Some people say the Song were on the breach of undergoing a capitalist revolution.

And so we come to the reign of Huizong, the year 1100.huizong

Huizong was a very refined man. Look at his face. He was a very skilled artist, and his paintings and calligraphy have survived to our time. Take a look at the link, they're very impressive. His handwriting is regarded as one of the best in Chinese history, and I'm particularly fond of it. It must be fun to be able to write like that. I'd be writing stuff all day.

1415239693-7013

Being an artist and all that, the emperor wasn't very much into government stuff. He was more into the joys of life. He liked painting, writing poetry, drinking with friends, playing football (they played Cuju, which sounds incredibly hard but apparently was very popular back then). He was into women too. He famously didn't like the uptight hookers that got sent to his palace, so he had a tunnel built to go from the palace to the fanciest brothel in the capital so he could have fun like just any other aristocrat.

He was also into gardening. He had the fanciest stones in the realm be sent to him to decorate his garden. Stuff like this.

01434f2e7a183fa4ff808081434a6f25

South China is full of this weird porous stones, and our emperor had a fancy for them. He had them brought from everywhere, and sent to the palace, rewarding who brought them with lots of gold. The thing is some of these stones were huge. China had canals all around its territory, so they could be relatively cheaply transported by water. But canals have bridges over them, and some of this stones just didn't fit below the bridges. So what did they do? These are Imperial Stones we're talking about. Rapacious bureaucrats who wanted to look good with the emperor had bridges demolished just so they could push the stones through to deliver to the emperor. The historical record is full of commoners wailing at the injustice. This is of course the time of the Water Margin and its peasant rebellions led by herodudes.

Huizong was also fond of weird animals. He had a part of his garden set up as a zoo, full with tigers, elephants and giraffes he had sent from Africa. In summary you'll have noticed that the emperor of the Great Song after 1100 AD is a fairly extravagant fellow. But hey, the Song is rich, they could afford a fanciful emperor. What they could not afford though is a stupid emperor. Because just as Huizong was having fun watching pandas battle with giraffes for bamboo at his home zoo, probably accompanied by some hooker, at this very moment his Khitan neighbors were in trouble. Very serious trouble.

Switch to Board View

15 comments

Leave a reply
  • [] The Song Golden Age []

    reply
    • [] Source: Bloody Shovel []

      reply
      • Do you know of any places I can find 漢武大帝 or another Chinese historical show with English subtitles?

        reply
        • A casual search on Youtube produced this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgRMteY-o0k Good movie. Most shows aren't in English. Somebody should hire me.

          reply
          • What is your opinion on the Chongzhen Emperor? He gets sympathetic views in China because he tried to turn the Ming around and hanged himself in Beijing. But Kenneth Swope thinks Chongzhen should get main blame for losing the war and that he wasn't all that great an emperor.

            reply
            • Chongzhen gets a good rep because his ancestors were actively evil, while he did try to get something done. But I don't believe in praising effort for itself. There's a good anecdote of just how utterly stupid Chongzhen was. Once Li Zicheng was rushing through Shanxi, and it was obvious he'd get to Beijing in a couple of weeks, the obvious course of action for Chongzhen was to flee the capital. Go south, to Nanjing, and try to pull a Southern Song again. Li Zicheng had made public that he didn't want the empire, just a cool gig in his home province. The whole thing would very likely have worked out. The Ming survives in the south, the rebels get parts of the north, and we wait it out to see what happens. Chongzhen never proposed going south. One day, one of his ministers proposed it in a private audience. And Chongzhen said "Yes! At last somebody says that. I've been thinking on fleeing for weeks now. But I can't say it myself, you know, it'd look bad, like I'm abandoning my people or something. I can't say it publicly so please please please propose it tomorrow at court and I'd get going." Next day the idea gets proposed in court, and the other ministers loudly proclaim this Must Not Be Done, the emperor must stay with his people! Chongzhen, instead of arguing back, got red of anger, threw a tantrum and said "Enough! You all bastards! You want me to die with the people! So be it! Shit!" and he dismissed the session. Later somebody proposed sending the crown price south instead, to set up an exile court, while the emperor did the right thing and stayed. The emperor threw another tantrum. "What, he gets to live and I don't? Never!". So the crown prince stayed. The very day Li Zicheng arrives at Beijing and starts storming the city, Chongzhen takes advantage of the chaos, puts on plain clothes and tries to flee the palace with a bunch of close guards. The guards at the gate don't recognize him and tell him to go away, nobody can leave, gates are closed. Poor guy didn't have anywhere to go, so he climbed some hill and hang himself, leaving a note "You ministers killed me!". Oh, and he had previously killed his daughters in the palace telling them "shouldn't have been born in my family". And so the Ming dynasty died with a whimper, because Chongzhen couldn't have some balls and order his ministers to fetch him a boat to go to Nanjing. When Dorgon gave Chongzhen a proper funeral he was probably honestly grateful; if it weren't for Chongzhen's stupidity the Manchus would've never been able to conquer the whole empire.

              reply
        • Thanks for posting the articles on China. They're very interesting.

          reply
          • [] spandrell is beginning a series about Chinese history, especially the Northern and Southern Song dynasties. That its existence centuries before the Qing Dynasty (considered by some to be one of []

            reply
            • Something seriously wrong with am emperor who cavorts with a whore that screwed every member of his court yesterday and will screw every member of his court tomorrow. If I was emperor, would have two thousand virgins locked up in the harem supervised so that they did not know what sex was or what men looked like, and pop each one when she became ripe.

              reply
              • Well in theory his favorite courtesans were reserved for him. I think he enjoyed the idea that people got to see her and listen her playing the lute or something, but only he got to fuck her. It's no fun having 2,000 virgins in the harem if you can't brag to buddies who have seen them semi-naked.

                reply
              • [] then offer them land, money, girls and a good time instead. And there’s more and moar: The Song Golden Age, The Song Dynasty’s Decline and Fall. I hope it is not annoying to him, but Spandrell wins an []

                reply
                • [] (4-part series) The distribution of power, The Song Golden Age, Its Decline and Fall. Classic Spandrellian storytelling from Chinese history in his own skeptical []

                  reply
                  • [] the Manchus took over with the enthusiastic help of Chinese generals. And of course my series (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)on the Northern Song Dynasty, and the story of how it spectacularly fell to the Jurchens []

                    reply
                    • [] are not unusual in the course of history. If you read Spandrell’s brilliant series of essays on the Song dynasty, you will learn how a mere 1,000 horse archers was enough to conquer the wealthiest nation on []

                      reply
                      • [] to mongolia because of internal problems more than mongolian military supremacy KS: or maybe im thinking of the manchus, i forget ZB: Even setting that aside, the Brits and the western powers Japan []

                        reply